Since it is difficult to find a good l2j geodata under c4, I would like to be able to use the PTS geodata.
DnR if possible, I propose to implement this feature.
DnR if possible, I propose to implement this feature.
3 posters
PTS GeoData
xlinkinx- Posts : 244
Join date : 2012-12-11
Age : 32
Location : Russian Federation
improvise- Posts : 144
Join date : 2017-07-21
As I know the difference between PTS and Java geodata is only in data structure.
Of course you can find some free shared converters using Google, but 99% that this wont have any positive results.
Also as if Geo Engine will recognize PTS Geodata. The same thing.
Of course you can find some free shared converters using Google, but 99% that this wont have any positive results.
Also as if Geo Engine will recognize PTS Geodata. The same thing.
Karakan- Posts : 756
Join date : 2013-10-04
You could create geodata files from the C4 client... but you wont see much of a difference.
The problem are not the geodata files ,its L2J's Geoengine.
This is one of last "areas" where L2Off servers are better when compared to L2Java.
DnR did a great job allready by implementing 2 geodata-engines to the project.
It was way worse before. (blame the lazy l2j devs)
The problem are not the geodata files ,its L2J's Geoengine.
This is one of last "areas" where L2Off servers are better when compared to L2Java.
DnR did a great job allready by implementing 2 geodata-engines to the project.
It was way worse before. (blame the lazy l2j devs)
xlinkinx- Posts : 244
Join date : 2012-12-11
Age : 32
Location : Russian Federation
I'm not talking about the advantages of PTS geodata, only the possibility to use it as ".l2j" so and ".dat", to put it simply "what is at hand".
Karakan- Posts : 756
Join date : 2013-10-04
Jeah, but that won't make any difference.
Why spend time on something which doesnt improve/add anything ?
Why spend time on something which doesnt improve/add anything ?
Similar topics
|
|
|